HomeMembersCommittees ▶ Committee

Documents Development and Implementation Committee

Chair Raed A. Dweik, MD Cleveland, OH
Vice Chair Charlie B. Strange, MD Charleston, SC
Committee Member Martha E. Billings, MD, MSc Seattle, WA
Committee Member - Methodologist Jan L. Brozek, MD, PhD Hamilton, ON, Canada
Committee Member David L. Cohn, MD Denver, CO
Committee Member Derrick Herman, MD Columbus, OH
Committee Member Jonathan Iaccarino, MD, MSc Boston, MA
Committee Member Narayan P. Iyer, MD Los Angeles, CA
Committee Member Athanasios Kaditis Athens, Greece
Committee Member Meeta P. Kerlin, MD, MS Philadelphia, PA
Committee Member Suzanne C. Lareau, RN, MS, FAAN Aurora, CO
Committee Member Richard A. Mularski, MD Portland, OR
Committee Member Christopher M. Oermann, MD Kansas City, MO
Committee Member Susan M. Tarlo, MBBS Toronto, ON, Canada
Committee Member Renda S. Wiener, MD, MPH Boston, MA
Committee Member - PAR Representative Susan Wisliceny Coral Gables, FL
Staff Judy Corn New York, NY
Staff Kevin Wilson, MD New York, NY
Staff John Harmon New York, NY

The Committee is charged with developing ATS policy concerning documents development, document review and evaluation, and document processing as below and making policy recommendations to the Executive Committee and Board of Directors. The primary responsibility of the Committee is to identify and foster opportunities for the ATS to develop, disseminate and implement ATS documents, and to identify appropriate groups (often within ATS Assemblies or Committees) or individuals to undertake these tasks. As one approach to this goal, it monitors the relevance and current status of previously published ATS documents, proposes dates for revisions, and works with relevant committees to identify and encourage potential document developers to revise and update the documents. The Committee also identifies strategies and opportunities for ATS to develop, disseminate, and help implement enduring products, derivatives, and electronic media related to ATS documents in conjunction with other ATS groups, such as the document developers, and the Education Committee. It also identifies members and non-members with expertise to support staff in the development and implementation of these strategies and opportunities.

The Committee oversees the work of the Documents Editor and provides support for the process of developing and reviewing ATS documents. This support may include serving as reviewers. It evaluates the performance of the Documents Editor and transmits this performance evaluation to the Executive Committee. The Documents Committee Chair also reviews the timeline for the status of existing ATS Documents under development at least quarterly.

The Committee recommends methodological policies for the development of official ATS documents and policies concerning effective dissemination and implementation of document recommendations. It is responsible for making policy recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding the general issues concerning site and format for publication of ATS documents. It works with the Documents Editor to review and revise Memoranda of Understanding for joint document development activities of the ATS with other societies or groups. The Document Committee and the Documents Editor are dually responsible for reviewing these Memoranda of Understanding before the Executive Director reviews and signs on behalf of the ATS.

Benchmarks, 2017-2018:
• In collaboration with the Program Review Subcommittee and the Publications Policy Committee develop a position on the value of:
a) creating official ATS documents in collaboration with other professional societies and organizations (i.e., co-sponsorship)
b) ATS endorsement of documents from other societies
• Continue to implement the guideline methodology training program.
• Develop a list of initiatives intended to enhance the value of the guideline methodology training program to the trainees and to improve the retention of the trainees for the purpose of building methodological capacity in the ATS.
• In collaboration with the Education Committee and the Quality and Implementation Committee, develop implementation toolboxes for all new ATS guidelines. Include frequent reassessment and as-needed modification of the derivatives contained within the toolbox.
• In collaboration with the Program Review Subcommittee develop a process to evaluate the selection and performance of project co-chairs and guideline methodologists.