Committees

HomeMembersCommittees ▶ Committee
Committee

Program Review Subcommittee

Chair Susanna A. McColley, MD Chicago, IL
Vice Chair Kristin A. Riekert, PhD Baltimore, MD
Committee Member Naeem A. Ali, MD Columbus, OH
Committee Member Ferran Barbe, MD Lleida 25198, Spain
Committee Member Rebecca M. Baron, MD Boston, MA
Committee Member Susan J. Bartlett, PhD Montreal, QC, Canada
Committee Member Laura Brenner, MD Boston, MA
Committee Member Cynthia D. Brown, MS, MD Indianapolis, IN
Committee Member Donna Caruthers, PhD, RN California, PA
Committee Member Ruan R. Cox, PhD Tampa, FL
Committee Member DorAnne M. Donesky, PhD, ANP-BC Benicia, CA
Committee Member Annette M. Esper, MD, MS Atlanta, GA
Committee Member Dee W. Ford, MD Charleston, SC
Committee Member Hilary J. Goldberg, MPH, MD Boston, MA
Committee Member Daniel B. Jamieson, MD Washington, DC
Committee Member Suzanne C. Lareau, RN, MS, FAAN Aurora, CO
Committee Member Joseph E. Levitt, MD, MSci Stanford, CA
Committee Member Gaetane C. Michaud, MD New York, NY
Committee Member Mary A. Nevin, MD Chicago, IL
Committee Member Charles A. Powell, MD New York, NY
Committee Member Kaharu Sumino, MD, MPH Saint Louis, MO
Committee Member Benjamin T. Suratt, MD Burlington, VT
Committee Member Renaud Tamisier, MD, PhD Grenoble, France
Staff Miriam Rodriguez New York, NY
Staff Kevin C. Wilson, MD Westwood, MA

The Program Review Subcommittee of the Finance Committee reviews project proposals submitted by assemblies and committees that require scientific peer-review and proposes a rank list in accordance with the priorities of the Society for consideration of funding in the annual budget.

Benchmarks, 2017-2018:
• Provide education to Committee Chairs and Assembly Planning Committee Chairs to improve the quality of applications, emphasizing time cycle of successful projects to avoid delays in project completion;

• Continue to enhance the assessment of proposals regarding their value to the Society’s mission;

• Develop a written guidance on collaboration with other organizations to streamline and coordinate the application process for joint documents;

• Implement methods to be nimble, allowing off-cycle review of projects identified as high priority by leadership;

• Develop and trial a system to triage low-quality applications to focus committee deliberations on higher quality applications, in order to enhance the ranking process; solicit feedback from applicants and committee members.