Committees

HomeMembersCommittees ▶ Committee
Committee

Program Review Subcommittee

Chair Kristin A. Riekert, PhD Baltimore, MD
Vice Chair DorAnne M. Donesky, PhD, ANP-BC, ATSF Benicia, CA
Committee Member Rebecca M. Baron, MD Boston, MA
Committee Member Susan J. Bartlett, PhD Montreal, QC, Canada
Committee Member Laura Brenner, MD Boston, MA
Committee Member Cynthia D. Brown, MS, MD Indianapolis, IN
Committee Member Donna Caruthers, PhD, RN California, PA
Committee Member Adithya Cattamanchi, MD San Francisco, CA
Committee Member Rafael E. de la Hoz, MD, MPH, MSc New York, NY
Committee Member Annette M. Esper, MD, MS Atlanta, GA
Committee Member Dee W. Ford, MD Charleston, SC
Committee Member Hilary J. Goldberg, MPH, MD Boston, MA
Committee Member Andrew J. Halayko, BS(Hons), MSc, PhD, ATSF Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Committee Member Daniel B. Jamieson, MD Washington, DC
Committee Member Suzanne C. Lareau, RN, MS, FAAN, ATSF Aurora, CO
Committee Member Joseph E. Levitt, MD, MSci Stanford, CA
Committee Member Janice M. Liebler, MD Los Angeles, CA
Committee Member Reena Mehra, MD Cleveland, OH
Committee Member Gaetane C. Michaud, MD New York, NY
Committee Member Mary A. Nevin, MD Chicago, IL
Committee Member Sara C. Sadreameli, MD, MHS Baltimore, MD
Committee Member Kaharu Sumino, MD, MPH Saint Louis, MO
Committee Member Benjamin T. Suratt, MD Burlington, VT
Staff Miriam Rodriguez New York, NY
Staff Kevin C. Wilson, MD, ATSF Westwood, MA

The Program Review Subcommittee of the Finance Committee reviews project proposals submitted by assemblies and committees that require scientific peer-review and proposes a rank list in accordance with the priorities of the Society for consideration of funding in the annual budget.

Benchmarks, 2018-2019:
• Provide education to Committee Chairs and Assembly Planning Committee Chairs to improve the quality of applications, note process changes, emphasizing time cycle of successful projects to avoid delays in project completion;
• Continue to enhance the assessment of proposals regarding their value to the Society’s mission;
• Develop and trial a review process for proposals for guidelines deemed critical by the ATS Board of Directors
• Develop written guidance on collaboration with other organizations to streamline and coordinate the application process for joint documents;
• Implement methods to be nimble, allowing off-cycle review of projects identified as high priority by leadership;
• Continue and refine system of triaging application review to focus committee deliberations on applications scoring higher, to enhance the ranking process; solicit feedback from applicants and committee members.